Kickdown Cable adjustment?

My shop manual is in the garage and it is raining biblically, is that the vertical ish adjustable one starting in the bottom left hand corner of my pic

kickdown003.jpg
 
The throttle link between the two carbs with the plastic ball joints on each end. Now I'm looking at it again it may just be that it's at full throttle in the pic that's making it look a bit odd.
 
I'm still on the case Harvey, and getting a little bit closer, I think it's in the linkage, but my back went bang (not an unusual occurence when I try to do too much) and I'm having to leave it for a couple of days as I want to be fit enough to use the car, minus kickdown, this weekend. It does make a lovely noise without the airbox on, but now refitted for weekend use.


John.
 
Rather than Hijack Rich's thread on Slepnir I have added a pic of my kickdown cable gearbox end nut which defied all spanners and adaptations.

kickdown006-3.jpg


I decided to use "Shock and Awe" tactics (well more tap and pray, or S##t or bust). I could not get a purchase on it as it was just off flat, and decided old school methods were required, a long thin punch and a 2lb hammer, because if you cannot fix something with hammer, you have an electrical problem, and this wasn't electrical :LOL:
Success and once the nip was off it came out 1 flat at a time with a stubby, by the time I had got it out I was time for a little nap, so I'll fit the new, 1" shorter cable tomorrow......ish.
Many thanks to Harvey for advice and a shorter cable.
An inch might not be much to some but it might as well be a mile to others.

John.
 
303 gearbox with the correct valve block.

Set the cable adjustment while you still have the sump off.

The cable needs to be set so that the heel of the cam where it returns on to the valve (which is acting as the return stop) is still touching the valve, but it moves off that the moment the cable moves upwards. Too tight and the cam will be off the valve and the pressures will be too high, both at idle, and all though the range, too slack, and the pressures will be OK at idle, but will lag behind the throttle opening all the way through from idle upwards.

Just be careful to make sure that none of the muck on the outside of the box, ends up on the inside.
 
Cheers Harvey, I don't know how you do it, but that was going to be my next question to you! :shock:
Sorry about the house keeping, I was going to clean the muck up around the switch and box top. Honest I was.


Many thanks John.
 
John, that silver shaped thing that looks like a gun is the filter. Remove the screws to take it out. It does have a gasket so be careful if you intend to reuse it. I cleaned my filter recently and flushed it with paraffin.
 
Cheers Mike, I thought it was, but I didn't want to undo the screws and find half a dozen dentente springs and ball bearings whistle past my ear :LOL:



John.
 
John said:
Cheers Mike, I thought it was, but I didn't want to undo the screws and find half a dozen dentente springs and ball bearings whistle past my ear :LOL:



John.

Nice one John , you've taken a picture of the filter and proceeded to ask if their is a filter :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: Have you started on the Christmas cheer early :D
Joking aside , i wondered where and what the filter was , and it's on my to do list , so i'll watch with interest :D
 
Hi Stina,

I took a friend's Rover which has a BW65 like yours to have the transmission serviced just over 2 years ago. The transmission man told me that with the 65, there are two types of filter, one can be removed, cleaned and refitted, the other however if I remember correctly is in a sealed housing, so is removed and a new one fitted. He said we won't know which one is in the box until the pan comes off.

Ron.
 
SydneyRoverP6B said:
Hi Stina,

I took a friend's Rover which has a BW65 like yours to have the transmission serviced just over 2 years ago. The transmission man told me that with the 65, there are two types of filter, one can be removed, cleaned and refitted, the other however if I remember correctly is in a sealed housing, so is removed and a new one fitted. He said we won't know which one is in the box until the pan comes off.

Ron.

I think that one of you has got that wrong. Either the transmission man told you a load of rubbish, or with the passage of time you've forgotten what he told you.
 
harveyp6 wrote,...
I think that one of you has got that wrong. Either the transmission man told you a load of rubbish, or with the passage of time you've forgotten what he told you.

Hi Harvey,

My memory tends to be pretty good most of the time and I can picture standing there beneath the Rover with this fellow as he was taking the pan off. It was more involved that removing the BW35 pan as he had to remove the dip stick/filler tube from where it resided in order to drop the pan. I don't know why he would tell me a load of rubbish, unless there is somehow a difference to the ones here in Australia?
Must say that when I asked him questions, even though he said that he had 25 odd years of experience, he didn't seem very sure of his answers or indeed in some cases didn't seem to know at all. Not very reassuring I thought at the time.

Ron.

P.S : This is NOT the gent who rebuilt my transmission in 2009. That fellow was totally switched on!
 
AFAIK there's only one type of filter fitted to all BW65's.
This thread is about the BW35, and the pic of the filter in the recent posting is one fitted into a BW35, and is the late type, and is correct for the valve block as fitted to that particular box, because as it's the later type, it will only fit the later type valve block. There was a previous pic that actually showed the difference in the two valve block types. It's true that you won't know which filter type is fitted until the sump is removed in that case, but only with the BW35, not the BW65. The earlier screen filter will fit either type valve block, but is incorrect on the later one. The screen filter is easily cleaned, the later one can still be cleaned, it just takes a little more effort.
Was this transmission man the same one that told you that both bands in the BW65 were self adjusting? If so, forget everything he ever told you.
 
harveyp6 wrote,...
Was this transmission man the same one that told you that both bands in the BW65 were self adjusting?

He didn't touch the bands or check the downshft adjustment even though the filter and the floor of the pan were covered in friction material. He did say that the bands were self adjusting, but then the owner of this Rover had been told that also by more than one other transmission man over the years.

Ron.
 
SydneyRoverP6B said:
He didn't touch the bands or check the downshft adjustment even though the filter and the floor of the pan were covered in friction material.

Well he wouldn't adjust the bands if he'd convinced himself they were self adjusting would he?

SydneyRoverP6B said:
He did say that the bands were self adjusting, but then the owner of this Rover had been told that also by more than one other transmission man over the years.

All that proves is that there are far more people about that don't know what they're talking about than people who do....
 
harveyp6 wrote,...
All that proves is that there are far more people about that don't know what they're talking about than people who do....

That is very true sadly, but worse they charge like wounded bulls for sub standard work.

Ron.
 
Well, the filter's out, washed and drying, but I don't think it has been doing much filtering for some time judging by the crap that came out of it!


John.
 
Back
Top