Fuel vapourisation... A problem when new?!

I know a lot of people suggest a 3 core Radiator however in my experience of vapour lock in my P6B with its 2 core factory radiator the temperature gauge does not seem to be in any different place than normal, this leads me to beleive the problems are unrelated to block or head temperatures but rather under bonnet temperatures and there effect on external items such as fuel lines and related items such as filters and reserve tap block.
Another avenue which I saw a mention of in the P6 News letters was maybe the effect of the rise or fall of the pipe lines and the movemennt of vapour in them.

graeme
 
my recently purchased 1976 P6B seems to suffer from this cursed problem (not helped by the recent hot weather i suppose)...!!! it is the inconsistency of the problem that is the most annoying thing as on some journeys it can be fine, but on others it can be a nightmare! has anybody got any pictures of 'vented' or 'scooped' bonnets as this could well be a good solution... failing that what should be done? i do not want a cracking looking motor that I do not want to use for fear of it conking out...!!!
 
The scooped bonnets were fitted to North American spec V8s from '69-'71. The scoops do turn up from time to time on Ebay and such but you would need a series 1 V8 bonnet to fit them to. Here's a beautiful example of a NADA car.
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=6795
Also, the central scoop appeared on a handful of air conditioned series 2 cars in 1971.
 
Hi Graeme. Glad to hear your two row rad is coping. But the temperature recorded by the gauge doesn't necessarily reflect wht is happening in particular locations in the engine. For instance; if the outlet from the inlet manifold is clear but all the nooks and crannies inside the casting are blocked up with crud then overall temperatures as recorded by the gauge will be normal but there will be localised hot spots in the manifold.

Chris
 
Are our problems caused by petrol vapourising in the carbs or the mechanical fuel pump ? I've always assumed it's the pump
 
Initially with my P6b, back in the 90's I had problems with vapourisation in slow traffic so I removed the mechanical pump and installed an electric pump in the engine bay, this cured the problem.
In the mid 2000's I started experienceing problems with it again this problem persisted regarless of speed time or temperature, eventually the electric pump failed........on replacement with the origional mechanical pump the problems stopped leading me to beleive that the vapour problems are more to do with the fueling system rather than carb or block related.( this also lead me to the conclusion that my 90's vapour problems were more about early offferings of unleaded fuel)

Chris as an aside I am no convinced that water passage blockages in the inlet manifold will cause dramatic hotspots of sufficient heat to upset the carbs as the inlet manifolds have no primary source of heat specific areas as there tends to be plenty of thermal isolation from the exhaust valves and head compression area and the general thermal dynamics of an alloy head even poorly cooled would still provide a good gradiant of cooling through out the head.

Graeme
 
DaveHerns wrote,...
Are our problems caused by petrol vapourising in the carbs or the mechanical fuel pump ? I've always assumed it's the pump

Hello Dave,

The problems start when the fuel vapourises before reaching the pump, as the mechanical pump cannot pull through and then expell vapour, hence the engine stutters and then ultimately stops. Vapour ahead of the pump is not a problem as the fuel that follows will fill the float bowls, no problem at all.

Ron.
 
At the risk of upsetting a few people, I can't see how the vapourisation starts before the fuel reaches the pump, when on all the ones I've done you can see the petrol in the filter boiling off the top. Heat rises, and with no way of releasing that heat from underneath the bonnet, it eventually builds up at the top under the bonnet until it vapourises in the carbs, and in the horizontal pipe across the manifold. The only other high point is over the back of the block, and that doesn't have the same amount of heat coming off it, and where it runs along the side of the block it does get hot, but it does in normal conditions as well. If it was vapourising before the pump and the fuel level was low in the tank then you'd never get the pump to draw it up again, and I've never had that problem.

With the cooling system working to its maximum efficiency, then you can delay the point at which it happens to a point where the car would have already boiled up. As I've said before I've never failed to cure them without resorting to an electric pump, the only thing I would add is that all those were prior to the intro of Unleaded, so that may well change the outcome now, but in most cases, I doubt it.
 
SydneyRoverP6B said:
Vapour ahead of the pump is not a problem as the fuel that follows will fill the float bowls, no problem at all.

Ron.
No it won't, because once it vapourises in the float bowls, then the engine stops, and while cranking on the starter it just continues vapourising as fast as the pump pushes up fresh petrol. You need to cool the carbs, and then it will restart. Although if you were talking about an electric pump, then that will continue pumping regardless of the engine turning over, but it still needs to cool down enough to stop the vapourisation, but the electric pump just enables that point to come earlier.
 
To coin a phrase, I agree with Harvey. That's why my hints and tips spent a while talking about how to get hot air out from under the bonnet. Equally, I'm still concerned that a blocked up inlet manifold water space is in just the right place to have a disproportionate effect just where the action is. Despite Harvey's assertion that the petrol must still be liquid as far as the pump, the routing of the fuel pipe between the bulkhead and the pump is less than intelligent - sandwiched between a hot engine and an even hotter radiating exhaust manifold! That's why I'm so impressed with GarethP6's mod.

Chris
 
harveyp6 wrote,...
At the risk of upsetting a few people, I can't see how the vapourisation starts before the fuel reaches the pump, when on all the ones I've done you can see the petrol in the filter boiling off the top. Heat rises, and with no way of releasing that heat from underneath the bonnet, it eventually builds up at the top under the bonnet until it vapourises in the carbs, and in the horizontal pipe across the manifold. The only other high point is over the back of the block, and that doesn't have the same amount of heat coming off it, and where it runs along the side of the block it does get hot, but it does in normal conditions as well. If it was vapourising before the pump and the fuel level was low in the tank then you'd never get the pump to draw it up again, and I've never had that problem.

With the cooling system working to its maximum efficiency, then you can delay the point at which it happens to a point where the car would have already boiled up. As I've said before I've never failed to cure them without resorting to an electric pump, the only thing I would add is that all those were prior to the intro of Unleaded, so that may well change the outcome now, but in most cases, I doubt it.

No it won't, because once it vapourises in the float bowls, then the engine stops, and while cranking on the starter it just continues vapourising as fast as the pump pushes up fresh petrol. You need to cool the carbs, and then it will restart. Although if you were talking about an electric pump, then that will continue pumping regardless of the engine turning over, but it still needs to cool down enough to stop the vapourisation, but the electric pump just enables that point to come earlier.

Hello Harvey,

An interesting way of looking at it, but as I have mentioned on more than one prior occasion, my Rover experienced vaporisation on a cold Winter's day in 1991, temp gauge in the white, carburettor dashops stone cold. It came, it went and in the interim it effected many local Rovers. As I have maintained, the fuel was the problem, and it was leaded at the time.

Why do I believe that the fuel will vaporise before the mechanical pump,...the suction induced by the pump results in a reduction in pressure in the line between the pump inlet and the tank. Exactly how far the pressure drop exists, I cannot say having not measured it.

Here is a link to substantiate my reasoning.

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/npsh- ... d_634.html

I recently obtained a book titled “Performance Tuning in Theory and Practice” by A Graham Bell. The author at the time the book was first published in 1981 had 17 years of engine building experience, 14 of them spent tuning and modifying high performance and racing engines.

In the text the author writes,…”The main weakness of using a front mounted pump is that it aggravates vapour lock. A high performance engine requires a lot of fuel so the line from the pump back to the tank will always be subject to suction or a vacuum. This means that the fuel in the line before the pump is going to boil at a much lower temperature than in would at normal atmospheric pressure. The only way around this is to fit a rear-mounted electric pump”

Rover offered a fuel line insulation sheath made from woven asbestos to cover the metal fuel line from the pump back to where the line changes to plastic across the bell housing. The part number is KRC1068. I fitted one to my Rover in April 1990. If Rover did not believe that radiant heat in this area might be a problem, why would they offer such a product?

When my Rover was experiencing vaporisation problems, the fuel in the filter would bubble as you indicated, and when I released the top nut you could hear the pressure being released, then liquid would flow and I would retighten the nut, and away I would go until it happened again. Was this boiling fuel being expelled by the mechanical fuel pump?

A successful solution that I employed was to wrap the fuel filter with a piece of cloth, detach the windscreen washer tubing and run a short separate piece of tubing from the pump and affix it to the cloth, then soak the cloth periodically by pressing the switch. It worked, but I wanted a cure, not a stop gap measure. The fitment of an electric pump beneath the tank running in series with the mechanical pump was the cure for the problem fuel. As I have previously indicated, the fuel was fixed and the problem disappeared.

Ron.
 
And on electric pumps, the Facet that I fitted to our P5B a while back, unnecessarily as it turns out (though it's now there if I need it) is proving no hindrance to the mechanical pump at all, which seems very happy pulling the fuel through the modern upstart to date. The car is used regularly.
Just so anyone who is interested knows.
 
The return should keep the pressure up because it gets pushed back round to the pump again, which is part of the reason that you can have a "pusher" electric pump mounted at the front and it works OK.

The insulation on to the metal pipe was offered by Rover so that they gave you an option of being able to buy something that supposedly would cure the problem, they can hardly say they're not aware of the problem and have nothing to remedy it. It's just a way of reducing the fuel temp by a small amount to delay the problem. The ultimate idea on the same theme would be to refrigerate the fuel tank.

If the petrol is boiling in the filter then it must be boiling off the top, so must have liquid fuel below it, it can just sit there with only air behind it. If it was boiling before the mechanical pump there would be no fuel in the filter.
 
LDD was back on Wednesday with Facet pump fitted. Driving quite a few miles (getting on for 200)over three days wth a mixture of fast A road, town, stop start in town running errands, country lanes and the dreaded driving in a circle round at 5mph in a local show a parade ring - all on the hottest days we have had this year the car didn't miss a beat. No gurgles, no splutters, no dreaded VL at all. I know each car is different, but the electric pump option has certainly worked for me.

Neil
 
OK how about this,my V8 is OK all the time you are moving,stand still for just a minute or two and it starts missing soon followed by stopping altogether.

If I disconnect the outlet from the fuel filter and turn the engine over absolutely no fuel comes through,however leave it for a few hours when everything cools down and turn the engine over agian the fuel pumps through like a water fountain.

I cant therefore believe the problem is boiling in the float chambers etc,the vapourisation surely occurs prior to the fuel pump inlet??

Am I correct?

Would an electric pump cure this do you all think?

Thanks in advance

Simon
 
sgmorris wrote,...
OK how about this,my V8 is OK all the time you are moving,stand still for just a minute or two and it starts missing soon followed by stopping altogether.

If I disconnect the outlet from the fuel filter and turn the engine over absolutely no fuel comes through,however leave it for a few hours when everything cools down and turn the engine over agian the fuel pumps through like a water fountain.

I cant therefore believe the problem is boiling in the float chambers etc,the vapourisation surely occurs prior to the fuel pump inlet??

Am I correct?

Would an electric pump cure this do you all think?

Hello Simon,

What you have shown by your test is that there is vapour in the line before the pump. As I indicated in my post above, this is the most likely place for the problem to occur, and your test is proof. If you fit an electric pump beneath the tank, you can either run it in series with the mechanical pump or remove it, but the vapourisation problem will no longer be a problem.

Ron.
 
Two things:

Firstly why would you automatically assume that the problem is vapourisation rather than an intermittant fault in the pump,
and secondly, even if it is vapourisation why must it be vapourising before it gets to the pump, rather than as it rises up to the filter? By your logic you would fit an electric pump and then say it cured the vapourisation, when in fact all it did was bypass another fault that you never found.
 
Thanks for the answers guys.

I take your point, but think it's unlikely to be an intermittent fault as the problem only ocurs when the car ticks over or sits in traffic when up to normal operating temperature,the problem never occurs while the car is moving.

I agree the problem that vapourisation could be in the line up to the filter,would be good if the problem is in there as its a short pipe and could possibly therefore be insulated/protected from the heat.

FWIW the car has cooled down now and I went and turned the engine over and sure enough the fuel jetted out of the pipe to the filter again.

ATB

Simon
 
Back
Top