When I was a boy, my father had a Humber Super Snipe series 3, which I can recall him saying was equipped with the above. My recollection was that if the car was in traffic on a steep hill, you could move the column mounted gear selector into second, and this would prevent the car from rolling backwards without having to use the brake. I should point out that I would have been no more than 14 at the time and most likely quite a bit younger.
When I was learning to drive in 1985 I am sure that I recall the Rover being equipped with the same. If the car was on a steep hill, talking your foot off the brake would see it start to move backwards, then selecting second would lock the car from further movement, just as if you had applied the brake. When the transmission was rebuilt in 1987, this feaure disappeared. I appreciate that an engine which idles too slowly will slip backwards on a hill, but I don't recall an excessive engine speed being necessary to initiate hill hold.
Was there such a feature as hill hold?
Ron.
P.S : With the 4.6, the car will hold on hills at idle in drive without having to use the brake whereas with the original 3.5 on the same road I would need to else post 1987 it would slide backwards.
When I was learning to drive in 1985 I am sure that I recall the Rover being equipped with the same. If the car was on a steep hill, talking your foot off the brake would see it start to move backwards, then selecting second would lock the car from further movement, just as if you had applied the brake. When the transmission was rebuilt in 1987, this feaure disappeared. I appreciate that an engine which idles too slowly will slip backwards on a hill, but I don't recall an excessive engine speed being necessary to initiate hill hold.
Was there such a feature as hill hold?
Ron.
P.S : With the 4.6, the car will hold on hills at idle in drive without having to use the brake whereas with the original 3.5 on the same road I would need to else post 1987 it would slide backwards.