1974 Rover 2200

FrazzleTC

Active Member
This looks like a very well presented example, from a prolific seller of very nice cars, generally bought on gumtree, for a fraction of the final selling price achieved on ebay. They're always immensely clean, and there's always a very long, slightly waffly description. This car does look pretty genuine, and a very nice example, though the exhaust doesn't sit as nicely as I would like, on a car which is likely to go for a lot of money. It'll be interesting to see what sort of price this fetches. The fact it hasn't got any history at all is unfortunate, as there's nothing to substantiate the seller's claims.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BREATHTAKING- ... 2ec715e44b
 
Wow, that is a long ad. I had to stop for tea break at half time :LOL: . The car does look nice and it's easy to believe that it is a pampered low mileage example. Remember the days when you could get P6s like this in the 1980's for few hundred quid :?: :( .

Quite right about the fuel reserve Harvey. Putting a few gallons in the car would only eat into the profit - much better to spend your £10 on some tyre black.
 
Nick
Given that the owner used it infrequently, for "high days and holidays" it may be a plug for a boost charger to ensure it would start when needed.
The sort of thing that a man who started motoring in the 30's, probably in 1920's motor cars, might have fitted.
Bitter experience would have taught him not to trust a car's electrical system!
Joe Lucas, Prince of Darkness and all that!
 
Genuine Rover badged rear seat belts, very rare in 1974, had been ordered and the car was, still is totally standard factory specification with the exception of an electric pre heat system (untested) fitted under the bonnet. This allowed the car to be plugged into the mains so it warmed up prior to starting! There has never even been a radio, aerial or wing mirrors fitted.

John.
 
Good lord! Straight to £3100 in three hours flat!

Now I really know P6 values are on the up. That could have happened for a nice V8 for a while, but not for a 4 pot however nice.

And if I'm being picky I would have much preferred an interior other than black box pleat cloth. And it's even an SC.

Gosh.

Chris

PS Oh, and with that usage history the engine could well be toast - need a set of bearings at a minimum!
 
I find it rather peculiar that everything that this chap sells goes for far more than any other example of the same car before it, and, funnily enough, tends to sell for just half of what it would cost 'to restore one to this standard today'. Could well be some shill-bidding there.
 
Having bought my latest 2000, last month... I can tell you what I found.
I used ebay extensively in my search (had been looking for 5 months for a suitable car).
I would have bid up to what I felt the car was worth to me. So someone on ebay will pay £3100 for this car so far, but it hasn't reached the reserve yet.
My budget was £5000 - for this money I was looking for a really good series 1 2000TC. I prefer the look of the earlier cars and for me, because the Rover was going to be our third car, it had to be tax free. I would have bought one regardless if classic cars didn't have historic status, but since they do I was only prepared to look for pre 73. I would have gone to £6000 for something amazing, but a 1974 2200sc with cloth seats, however original and nice is not amazing to me.
I decided against a series one V8, my past experience has been that they (V8 autos) are too thirsty and I would like to use the car as often as possible in the spring and summer. Although I do love the V8 smoothness and power, petrol (super unleaded) is expensive.
I bought Simon Hill's lovely 1964 Wedgwood Blue 2000 for £3500 in the end. This car was extensively restored in 2006 by Clive Annabel and has been used every year since and kept under cover when not, so it's still lovely. The baseunit on this car is a work of art. I would rather have a beautifully restored car, that has then been used and enjoyed... then an original car that has been stored for several decades that will need new brakes for a start and probably won't be reliable for months, due to its lack of use. I am delighted with my car and it's lovely to own such an early car which has been restored with all of the original features kept. This more than made up for the desire for a TC model and in fact this car goes like no other 2000 that I have ever driven (and that's a few!).
 
Bit of a mix n match on the switch console there with some S1 and S2 switches? Was this correct for a Series 2 SC? Was it only the TC and V8 models that got a full bank of chunky green switches?

Dave
 
Unfortunately so, Dave! I've often wondered why buyers of series 2 SCs and automatics were treated like second-class citizens in terms of the layout. For a car that had such an attractive, and sophisticated layout in Series 1 form, it looked like a step backwards. I do really like the the series 2 TC and V8 set-up, and, had if I a series 2 SC, I'd be inclined to change the switchgear.
 
Yes .£3995 in the advert but £2995 on the windscreen. I'd have said it was well worth £2995 but it's going to need some work and new tyres after a long hibernation
 
chrisyork said:
Good lord! Straight to £3100 in three hours flat!

Now I really know P6 values are on the up. That could have happened for a nice V8 for a while, but not for a 4 pot however nice.

And if I'm being picky I would have much preferred an interior other than black box pleat cloth. And it's even an SC.

Indeed. Only being Tobacco Leaf with that black cloth interior would have put it further down the food chain IMHO.
 
DaveHerns said:
Yes .£3995 in the advert but £2995 on the windscreen. I'd have said it was well worth £2995 but it's going to need some work and new tyres after a long hibernation

I thought the same about the tyres. It is nice that it has Pirelli Cinturatos but if they are 18+ years old and the car has sat for 18 years, you would be mad to drive on them. If the car has only done 31,000 miles and was very carefully driven, is it just about conceivable that the tyres are original :?:
 
Back
Top